Xander:
http://ca.games-workshop.com/Community/PaintOrDie/PoD_home.htm
Vote for the Chaos Dwarf army! Praise Hashut! :evil:
Hashut’s Blessing:
It is an AWESOME looking army. But, if I remember correctly, it is using the normal dwarf rules.
Xander:
It is an AWESOME looking army. But, if I remember correctly, it is using the normal dwarf rules.Ya, it's really a shame that he didn't have, er... "the balls" to use the real list.
Hashut's Blessing
Hashut’s Blessing:
Still, it is showing us lot off, eh?
Xander:
Exactly! It has given us a lot of good publicity, and that’s awesome!
The Flying Beaver:
I’ve seen this army in person. Kris is a really great guy. Man, half of the white dwarf editors in Canada play CD’s! How great is that?
Hashut’s Blessing:
Too great for words.
Xander:
Where is Kris from?
Man, CDs rock. 
Bill-117:
This army looks awesome.
One question, though…exactly, what is the four-legged mechanical thingy?
Xander:
Since Kris went with the Dwarf rules, he made the Mechanical Bull as an Anvil of Doom, if I am not mistaken…
The Raven:
That is one neat army, but then again, he had it easy on resources. I especially love the rocket battery, but I’m not so fond of the mechanical bull.
Monty:
Awesome… as stated already. Why would you ruin perfect conversions by playing the lame dwarfs?
The Flying Beaver:
That is one neat army, but then again, he had it easy on resources.He had to pay for it with his own money, and these conversions were really expensive. I think a single regiment of chaos dwarfs cost him more then twice what a normal regiment costs.
Lord Zarkov:
until you factor in staff /Kg bitz orders
for a staffer a coverted CD regiment would be cheaper than a boxed plastic one for us I would imagine
Monty:
until you factor in staff /Kg bitz ordersAgreed - also he said he picked up lots of parts from the studio... i.e. free-bees
for a staffer a coverted CD regiment would be cheaper than a boxed plastic one for us I would imagine
Lord Zarkov
Regardless of cost its a pretty complex conversion for the final result (not saying it isn't great, it is, - just probly could have had similar results with less parts and conversions)