[Archive] Bull Centaurs or 'demi giant'?

Grimstonefire:

By a demi giant I mean a smaller giant on 40mm base. Could be a slave giant, but would probably be a machine.

He would be more reliable than a regular giant, as his attacks etc would be as with regular monsters, but he would have a weaker profile.

Many will wonder why I don’t just say include a regular stats giant? IMO we don’t need a full blown giant in our list, but a ‘demi giant’ would

a) be more in keeping with the CD army, it would be really squat looking.

b ) would keep things a little more balanced.

The reason I suggest having him instead of Bull Centaurs is that this guy would be rare, and something has to go.

It might be possible to have an upgradable Earthshaker (up to a hellcannon), but I think our list would be unbalanced to keep both cavalry and giants.

Nehan:

Bullcentaurs, of course, and also demigiant:idea

minty:

Umm, bull centaurs all the way

cornixt:

Why not just a big Bull Centaur? or Minotaurs of Hashut?

The Flying Beaver:

Get rid of bull centaurs? Um… yeah… Good luck with that…

Lord Darkash:

BCs rock greatly. But i have often thought that there should be “avatars” of hashut, like winged minotaurs…

Shindeshai:

I’m liking that winged minotaur idea. could be an animated statue of Hashut from the temple of hashut or something like that