[Archive] Infernal Castellan or Dark Castellan?

Archive [Archive] Chaos Dwarf Discussion
21

Thommy H:

Well, you’re correct that it could stand to be less confusing. I had to get my copy of Tamurkhan from upstairs and give it a close read to make sure I wasn’t talking nonsense. And if they hadn’t been so inconsistent with name in the first place, it wouldn’t be an issue.

I think if it was more than cosmetic, this debate would have happened when the FAQ came out, but as it is no one ever gave it more than a few second’s thought…

22

Discoking:

I think if it was more than cosmetic, this debate would have happened when the FAQ came out, but as it is no one ever gave it more than a few second's thought...

Thommy H
Fluff is more than cosmetic ;)

Thanks for correcting me though;
& for blowing the dust off of my BA Hons :cheers
23

Nicodemus:

I can’t believe we’re up to two pages of posts on this thread. When I first signed on to CDO tonight and saw this was now a separate thread I immediately thought “Who made this its own topic? This is insane, it was an open and shut case”… but then I read though this thread and I’m glad it’s going to remain separate from the Daemonsmith’s Handbook!! Yikes, thanks cornixt! :stuck_out_tongue_winking_eye:

~N