# Poisoned attacks question

**URL:** https://discourse.chaos-dwarfs.com/t/poisoned-attacks-question/27117
**Category:** Army List and Gaming Discussion
**Created:** [14 December 2024 01:43 UTC](https://discourse.chaos-dwarfs.com/t/poisoned-attacks-question/27117 "2024-12-14T01:43:52Z")
**Posts on this page:** 3
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![ErikinEast](https://discourse.chaos-dwarfs.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/e/f04885/32.png) [@ErikinEast](https://discourse.chaos-dwarfs.com/u/ErikinEast)
#### Post date: [14 December 2024 01:43 UTC](https://discourse.chaos-dwarfs.com/t/poisoned-attacks-question/27117/1 "2024-12-14T01:43:52Z")

</div>

Hi all,

A quick question about Poisoned attacks. Does the auto-wound apply to strength/toughness combinations that normally would be impossible to wound? e.g. normally a S2 attack cannot wound something that is T8. However, if it is a poisoned S2 attack, does that mean that any hits that roll a 6 will wound, but then all other hits (i.e. those hits that were made with a dice roll other than a 6) would auto-fail the roll-to-wound step?

Wondering this particular for the Bale Taurus and whether it can avoid some of the poison meta.

Thanks

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Jasko](https://discourse.chaos-dwarfs.com/user_avatar/discourse.chaos-dwarfs.com/jasko/32/378_2.png) [@Jasko](https://discourse.chaos-dwarfs.com/u/Jasko)
#### Post date: [14 December 2024 11:25 UTC](https://discourse.chaos-dwarfs.com/t/poisoned-attacks-question/27117/2 "2024-12-14T11:25:59Z")

</div>

Yes, a poisoned hit will always wound automatically, even if the strength of the attack would normally be too low to wound.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![ErikinEast](https://discourse.chaos-dwarfs.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/e/f04885/32.png) [@ErikinEast](https://discourse.chaos-dwarfs.com/u/ErikinEast)
#### Post date: [14 December 2024 14:26 UTC](https://discourse.chaos-dwarfs.com/t/poisoned-attacks-question/27117/3 "2024-12-14T14:26:44Z")

</div>

Ah alas okay thanks for clarifying
