DAGabriel:
As most of you may have noticed I am concentrating on collecting and painting 3rd ed. CDs, in a planned game in january I have to play them according to LoA.
My question, would you accept Whirlwind and Tenderizer on one base as a Skull Cracker?
Have seen some old BCs double up on one base as a new one which gave me the idea.
Zuh-Khinie:
I’d accept it, considering it’s the model that inspired the skull cracker in the first place 
If it doesn’t look to ridiculous, I’d even place a single one on a base.
Karring:
I'd accept it, considering it's the model that inspired the skull cracker in the first place :)+1. Placing it in the adecuate base, you are only making a "count as";)
If it doesn't look to ridiculous, I'd even place a single one on a base.
Zuh-Khinie
Vogon:
I would also go with just one on an appropriately sized base (the tenderiser would be the favourite).
To be honest I don’t think the frontage is all that different anyway so it won’t look lost on the base on its own.
Cheers
Vogon
Admiral:
You could always fill out the empty sections on the base with Chaos Dwarfs, Hobgoblins, terrain or people getting butchered by the Whirlwind or Tenderizer.
Da Crusha:
I used my tenderizer as an iron deamon early on and I just wasn’t happy with how small the figure is capared to the ID and was supposed to have T8 W8.
DAGabriel:
Thx, guys.
Now, since I have got both, I will do a big base with slots for the normal base. They are both in Aceton, so will take some time.