I feel it may have more to do with the amount of silliness required to get away with charging £8 per figure. :)
I agree it would look better minus the banner. Why would a Slayer need or want a banner anyway?
Baggronor
Totally agree. Back banner is just silly. (like 99% all back banners) but overall its a very nice model, not the best dwarf model ever but still..
I agree with GRNDL (did somewhere warm just freeze over?) wrong type of dwarf.
Willmark
Nope. Still a balmy 22C inside here.
Samurai had huge silly banners attached to them didn't they. Aztec "animal-warriors" used flamboyant headdresses that cannot have been exactly practical. And that's just ignoring nature itself who tops anything we'd come up with by a mile.
Sometimes stupid overbearing impractical back-banners are just the ticket.
"If that dude can fight with an huge unbalancing banner strapped to his back, he must be really bad-ass. Oh damn, he has also killed a Dragon. I really need to find another opponent. Aaaaaaaah!"
Sometimes stupid overbearing impractical back-banners are just the ticket.
"If that dude can fight with an huge unbalancing banner strapped to his back, he must be really bad-ass. Oh damn, he has also killed a Dragon. I really need to find another opponent. Aaaaaaaah!"
snowblizz
all the back banner tells me is "lower your point of aim"
Another great sculpt from Felix’s hands - but like a few others I don’t get, why he needs that heavy looking back banner. Ain’t he meant for Arena Deathmatch? Who would enter the arena with such a banner?
But definitely a great sculpt - and I think that this fig will be added to my collection of AoWs as well.