Grimstonefire:
I’m sure I read that somewhere, that Rick said he was considering doing them as monstrous cavalry.
Does anyone else remember seeing this? Do you think it would be a good idea?
Based on the concept art I really can’t see them being that big.
Thommy H:
They’re Monstrous Beasts in my book. If they had 2 Wounds, this would seem to be fine.
nitroglysarine:
hmmm, could stick a character on its back to 
it is a horse at the end of the day 
Da Crusha:
ahmmm…Bull
This message was automatically appended because it was too short.
snowblizz:
I'm sure I read that somewhere, that Rick said he was considering doing them as monstrous cavalry.What would the differences be in making them monstrous cavalry over monstrous beasts?
Does anyone else remember seeing this? Do you think it would be a good idea?
Based on the concept art I really can't see them being that big.
Grimstonefire
Baggronor:
If they are Monstrous Cavalry, I would imagine they will have a trample attack which would constitute the cavalry part of their rules, thus meaning they would only make supporting attacks with their weapons (the ‘rider’) part.
I’ve never been that keen on them being Monstrous, but maybe its a good move, as they just don’t seem workable as normal cavalry (save too low, strike last, not worth it).
Thommy H:
Monstrous Cavalry would get +1 armour save. That’s technically the only difference.