[Archive] Why take Black Orcs?

Swissdictator:

All kidding aside they might be our best infantry. The lack of a Black Orc boss sucks but for the points the hitting power and the fluff they are cool. I mean Chaos Dwarfs created them? How cool is that?

Willmark
Quoted for truth. It is beyond cool. It's like an evil twisted for of eugenics... (Not that Eugenics is good... it is pure evil without question).

It's things like this that keep me in love with the little hateful little balls of spite. Hard not to love them when they are such little vile engineers of death, doom, and destruction!

They in many ways created the biggest bane for their western traitorous so called brethren. Gotta have some pride in that. If nothing else, Black Orcs for a Chaos Dwarf (and I'd argue an O&G player) have a cool/fluff factor beyond counting!

Also as Willmark said earlier, we don't have the best special choices. We have Bolt Throwers (which count 2 for 1 slot), Death Rockets, and Black Orcs. To much of the former is overkill and a little too beardy (and a bit unwise)... generally you'll always have a slot free for Black Orcs. As has already been said if we could take two, many of us would.

Having fielded them in a recent tournament, I've been happy with them.

Ubertechie:

It is the old adage that the sum of the parts is greater than the individual components e.g.

Unit of 25 CD warriors - very resilient, slow- lots of static combat res - hard to get rid of but generate few kills against most enemies

Unit of 6 Black Orcs - pretty easy to kill, ,average infantry move (so fast in comparison to a CD warrior) - no static combat res - capable of generating lots of kills

The 2 units perfectly complement each other (I could of used consultant speak and mentioned synergy …) and for such a small investment into the Black Orc unit you get a massive uplift to the usefulness of your CD warrior blocks.

The only other decent replacement for them are Sneaky Gits if you are facing a mainly t3 foe as they will probably generate the same amount of kills but are more resilient for the points (2.5 sneaky gits for each black orc)

Piccolo:

Double check the Orc and Goblin rulebook but the Black Orcs have an interesting special rule. They can change their weapons every round of combat. They charge in with Great Weapons and can switch to Choppa/Shield for the next round.

BilboBaggins
Unfortunatley not. They can choose what weapon they use at the start of the combat (like any other unit) but they have to use that weapon through the remainder of the combat. The rule simply gives them an option to carry several weapons, nothing more.

dedwrekka:

Double check the Orc and Goblin rulebook but the Black Orcs have an interesting special rule. They can change their weapons every round of combat. They charge in with Great Weapons and can switch to Choppa/Shield for the next round.

BilboBaggins
Unfortunatley not. They can choose what weapon they use at the start of the combat (like any other unit) but they have to use that weapon through the remainder of the combat. The rule simply gives them an option to carry several weapons, nothing more.


Piccolo
They can already carry several weapons. There's no limit on the number of weapons a regular rank and file model can carry, or a character for that matter. You can have some rank and file units with shields, spears, handweapons, and extra handweapons without a special rule to say that they can carry all of them.

Piccolo:

I know that many troops have such options. I didn’t make the rules, I’m just saying how they work.

CheTralfara:

It's like an evil twisted form of eugenics...

SwissDictator
Wooooah... Please say you're joking!? I really hope you're not taking the Dictator part of your username a little too seriously...

You do realize that eugenics is the practice of bio-engineering of racial traits through practices like inbreeding, euthanasia, sterilization, testing diseases/poisons/weapons on unknowning participants, and promoting abortion in lower class neighborhoods (just the tip of the iceberg folks)

Yes black orcs would fall under that category... but it already IS an evil twisted practice. How can you actually think otherwise? (honestly curious, PM me if you have an alternate view)

Xander:

I think he meant twisted in the sense that Orcs are the subjects rather than humans. I think you read way too far into that off-hand remark.

Groznit Goregut:

Wow…that was wildly off topic…

If black orcs could switch weapons each round, that would almost make them worth taking. So far, though, I haven’t heard anything that makes them worth taking over chaos dwarfs.

The lack of Animosity is good, but not that good. I don’t think they are worth it for 14-15 pts a pop. I’d just go with chaos dwarfs for cheaper points. The only extra benefit that blorcs get over cd warriors is an extra 1" of movement and the ability to have 2 hand weapons. They have lower leadership. They cost a crazy too much more than regular chaos dwarfs for little benefit.

As far as black orcs in an OnG army, that’s another discussion and I’ve been through those on Da Warpath many times before. I think the OnG community is split 50%-50% on the matter. I’m just starting to try to use black orcs for the first time in that army.

CheTralfara:

I agree the last part when I got into the part about World Government, was not on topic. And I understand why Xander took it out. I failed to mention the connection between the small banker elite who are creating a world government and the eugenics cult. However Xander took out a few paragraphs that were on topic to my response to what Swiss said. Xander I understand that you don’t think swiss needs to be told what eugenics is, but I think it’s fair for people to know what we’re talking about, and it does relate to Black Orcs, as they were indeed created with eugenics. Also, it seemed like swiss didn’t know what eugenics were by implying they weren’t evil and twisted already. Being he’s a history buff he’s should be interested in this anyway…

I’ll post the rest in the off topic section sometime.

—Short Summary of some of the History of Eugenics—

Eugenics was the entire philosophy behind Adolf Hitler’s quest to create a Master Race of Super Humans. After World War II, the Eugenicists in power throughout the world, fought over who got to keep the Nazi Doctors who committed abhorrent and gruesome experiments on the jews in order to further eugenics. They were not prosecuted for war crimes like the rest of the Nazis… I wonder why?

Eugenicists widely believe in the mass extermination 80% of the human race in an effort to attain “perfect” population level. This is even bragged about on monuments (their own books/teachings/lectures/etc.) like the georgia guidestones in the US today.

Eugenics is carried out throughout the world today in so many ways I can’t even begin to list them. They range from disturbing to ragingly disgusting. A popular eugenics organization in the US you may have heard about is Planned Parenthood. Here’s a quote from it’s lovely founder Margaret Sanger.

“The undeniably feeble-minded should, indeed, not only be discouraged but prevented from propagating their kind.” - Margaret Sanger

"The most merciful thing that the large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it." - Margaret Sanger

Sanger was highly praised by Hitler for her work in eugenics and her promotion of abortion as a population control tool. Often calling her his inspiration, Hitler ensured she worked closely with the most important person in the early Nazi movement, Dr. Ernst Rudin, to plan their new society.

Ubertechie:

Che

Seriously, you need to not take these things so personally, yes I think we all accept that the work carried out by the Nazi regime was am atrocity and that maybe Swiss could have thought about that BUT we don’t needs lecture or a history lesson. You constantly seem to want to drag things off topic and you often seem to be angling for a dispute.

I am sorry if you find that annoying but you are the only person that posts here that makes me feel anything but good things.

Mods if this post was out of order please delete and pm me accordingly however I felt that I needed to say this

Swissdictator:

Che: I was going to write a lengthy post, but I won’t. I’ve tried being polite to you, and I am not going to be rude either.

If you think I’d ever approve of eugenics or bigotry you do not know me. Those who are my friends here can confirm I have no patience for hatred or bigotry. As a future history professor, I stand in a position to help fight racism.

If you think I have said something so horrible… contact me. PM me. I will correct you and/or reword my statement so it is clear that I am not some sort of horrible person. I am doing so with the above post.

Willmark:

Che-

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_law

Please direct it back on topic…

CheTralfara:

@ Willmark: Thank you for that link! that is really cool! I had never seen that before. I really like and think this part is very profound and true… “overuse of Nazi and Hitler comparisons should be avoided, because it robs the valid comparisons of their impact.” I really like how Godwin creatively made it a point to reverse that trend, by creating the “Godwin’s Law”. 

I can see why the posts would remind you of that totally. But at the same I don’t think “godwin’s law”…

“that the person who first makes an unwarranted reference to Nazi Germany or Hitler in an argument loses that argument automatically.”

…happened in this case, because i wasn’t the first person who made a reference to a nazi program/philosophy/institution/whatever… and I don’t think there was ever any arguement. Especially since me and Swiss (as I now realize) were in agreement about eugenics the whole time.

@ Swiss: I am sincerely sorry. I owe you an apology, because I obviously misunderstood what you originally said. Please know that it wasn’t an attack, only a hopeful plea for clarity that you weren’t saying what I thought you said. And you gave me just that, and I am relieved.

I do hope you can understand how I could misunderstand what you meant to say, because of wording and such. My reaction was out of genuine concern, so that there isn’t any confusion of what eugenics is, since I see it as being very culturally significant at this time in history, this moment in time, right now… Basically because it is very alive today, very little talked about, and existing very actively essentially under the radar of the public, and is largely being touted as being humanitarian in nature and goal (bluff! bluff! :)). I just felt it was something important to understand fully (for the same reason a person says it is important to know about the holocaust… so history doesn’t repeat)…

Please understand that the reason why eugenics is so dastardly, is even deeper and worse than racism. It’s literally a philosophy that is the anti-thesis of a free humanity. The opposite of compassion for your fellow man. It completely dehumanizes us down to the level of clay for them to build with, toy with, and manipulate to the desires of the few.

It is my sincere hope that at the very heart of our spirit and the collective consciousness of all living things… we are evolving together in step, to free all of humanity… to become a peaceful, respectful, and understanding civilization … a civilization that is intellectually empowered to be inspired and aspirational as individuals … one that practices TRUE COMPASSION (not the socialism-style pseudo-compassion) and LOVE for our fellow (hu)man.

As ever-evolving beings of intelligence, we are hand-in-hand on a path of enlightenment and empowerment, that is utterly impossible to stopped with ancient, archaic, barbaric, de-evolved ideologies (like eugenics) that embrace the self-hating masochistic acts of slaughtering, tormenting, or enslaving, THEIR fellow man (The sons and daughters of earth = Their family! = OUR family… Us! … I’m talking mankind as one living entity. That shares a unique bond that is utterly mystifying and infinite in potential!)

I really hope that explains where I was coming from and why I thought it should be public post rather than private response. I’ll end it at that.

@ Ubertechie: I can assure you that you’re misunderstanding me and my intentions. I’m gonna really try my best to help clear up our miscommunication that’s breeding any negative feelings… with just this response.

…Basically I see this thread as a group discussion… a discussion is the exchange of ideas and information… and as it progresses, ideas can evolve, and birth brand new ideas and new perspectives… (This is a wonderful thing for us Chaos Dwarf generals!)

This is how we teach and learn from each other how to build really badass conversions… The way we brainstorm new ways to recreate, envision, and bring life to the Chaos Dwarfs that GW forgot… The way we inspire and motivate each other to create. Because Let’s be honest, the Warhammer hobby is an artform!..

Where I am going with this, is that we can easily label a posting as ‘off topic’, because it’s not outrightly directly connected to the first post in the thread, or thread title.  But it’s important to remember that, that post, was just the starting place.

What I posted was a response to something that was said recently in the thread… It was a still a progression/continuation/whatever from the previous posts… Was it a big jump? maybe/probably… Was it a long post? Yeah i do that alot… Look at my army blog.  

But… was it really out of the blue?  Not to a person who read the eugenics sentence I responded to, in the way that I had read it.

Was it derailed?  No way! (Hooray! :)). Not only can we still all respond to every and any idea and comment that has been made in the ENTIRE thread so far… but isn’t it very often that new posts will respond to ONLY/specifically to that very first post… We can even completely skip and ignore any post we don’t feel like talking about :slight_smile:

The great part is that because I respect all of you, and am open to your wishes and ideas… and am FULLY behind this being a place of friends, not a place to bicker… I will completely respect your requests for this topic to be redirected from whence it came. Blorko-whytakethem-vania :slight_smile:

Why to take dem blorkers?? … Aha! to take-ah da blorc? . To shave-ah-de-bee-errrr -Dahh!

A Hobba Gobba-lin sayzz er…
A. To convert your own a playable regiment of ELITE CHAOS DWARF INFANTRY!  Immortals Much? hellyes! hehehe

B. Because the plastic blorks are wunna da best model GW makes!

…AND I offer something new from combining our ideas and topics in this post… Something I don’t think has been pondered/discussed much (but please forgive me if it already has). It izzzz…this . . .

So now that we’ve basically realized that our little evil stunty bastards are not only daemonsmithies extrordinaire, but also little eugenicistic cultoid scum who have successfully created this breed/race/sub-species of ultra-orc, that we know as Black Orcs… I ask you…

Specifically how do you think we made them  ???.. ?

What type of sick unwilling experimentation directly resulted in the birth of these Dark & Focused Orcish Hulks.

Are they Testube Orcs?
- genetically engineering? perhaps there are daemonic sciences? arcane science?

Was it inbreeding?
- a common incestual birth defect being “giganticism”!

Maybe cross-breeding?
- an orc + a what? + a what? + a what?
(how many brutal beast gotta boink an orc ta getta blork?

One thing is for certain, the Chaos Dwarf eugenics program must be equally clandestine as it’s real-world counterpart… for ominous mystery and ambiguous rumor surrounds the Chaos Dwarf origins of the Black Orc race.

— What does “WDP:Chaos Dwarfs” have to say about it??? (slaps forehead for not consulting the wiki foist)

.nick

p.s. Swiss, Please consider doing an edit of that sentence that I confyoozled… so that it doesn’t sound like you’re implying that real-world eugenics isn’t dark and twisted already… I know it’s not what you meant. But maybe… like re-wording it or something, can prevent any future reader confyooooozzzzllllnissness, I guess? Your call. N/m You already did it, and it made me smile very wide. It just scared me at first was all!! Please forgive me!! :frowning:

p.s.s. miscommunication = a very frequent source of animosity… that creates an illusion of polar opposition between people who in reality are in complete agreeance on the matter at hand.

note: any and all references to freedom = the freedom to exercise your every choice, without the worry or threat of government intervention as long as that choice doesn’t infringe on another persons freedom.

Grimstonefire:

Has anyone ever taken Grimgor in a CD army?

He is a seriously 'ard character, and if you can get around the fluff issues (say for example that he cannot be the general), it would make for a powerful addition. Plus he has Immortalz!

AllEvil:

I once used him in a Legendary battle. I cant quite recall exactly how well he did, but with his Immortalz he destroyed a unit of Swordsmasters and beat Tyrion in a Challenge. I think he survived the battle with a single wound left.

This was a fair while ago, so I cant remember any real details.

CheTralfara:

Woah I didn’t know you could take Grimgor in a Chaos Dwarf army? How does that work? he counts as Dogs Of War?

would CDs really want to give Black Orcs such a heroic figure for them to rally behind after the black orc revolt :wink:

.nick

BilboBaggins:

I don’t think you could take him except with special permission. I don’t remember seeing Black Orc Big Boss as an option in heroes for our army.

From the List.

Lords:

Chaos Dwarf Lord, Sorcerer Lord, 0-1 Bull Centaur Lord

Heros:

Chaos Dwarf Hero, Chaos Dwarf Sorcerer, Bull Centaur Hero, Hobgoblin Hero.

Sorry no Grimgor there.

Allowable from the O&G Book:

Special Choice: Orc Boyz, Goblins, 0-1 Black Orcs

Again no Grimgor

Checking Grimgor’s rules and it doesn’t say that he is available for any other army.

So Sorry, no Grimgor for the Chaos Dwarf generals out there.

Grimstonefire:

I didn’t mean use him ‘legally’, just for fun!

Swissdictator:

I didn't mean use him 'legally', just for fun!

Grimstonefire
He'd honestly steal the show I think. I really do. He'd even detract from a Lord on Taurus with Black Hammer.

For a fluff/fun/themed game I'd have some sort of rule where there's a chance he just goes bonkers and rebels. I'm not sure how to approach that though.

BilboBaggins:

I heard talk of using Grimgor (or his statline) leading the greenskin rebellion. It could be interesting if you had him with rules saying that he could turn on you depending on how you were doing during the scenario as part of a larger greenskin rebellion campaign.