wallacer:
WarplockMonkey:
Hmmmm, looks a bit ‘organic’, and he looks a bit small as well
How come you use so many rackham models? They are alot different to GW figures, is there any reason?
Thommy H:
I agree with the ‘organic’ comment. It has the look of a monster rather than a machine. Maybe if you converted it so the face wasn’t visible in the middle, or made it appear more obviously daemonic (rather than just mutated) it might fit.
I did have the exact same thought when I first saw the figure a few weeks ago though. It’s certainly an impressive (if somewhat insane) piece.
wallacer:
How come you use so many rackham models? They are alot different to GW figures, is there any reason?Personally, I think Rackham make better miniatures than GW.
WarplockMonkey
Plus, I don't much like the Big Hat CD miniatures, which means that since I wanted a large CD army with no duplicates and no big hats I was pretty much forced to buy other companies figures (or wait until 2009 and hope GW rerelease the CDs with new miniatures).
Ghrask Dragh:
It would take a-little converting to make it look more machine than stone I agree but it would be what I would get to make mine (if I were to going to make one).
I think Rackham models are some of the best around, more character than any other company for sure!
And it’s also nice to see a company that actually has a sense of humour!!
Revlid:
I personally loathe the Rackham style for everything except Daemons, which are meant to be oddly proportioned and caricatured.
This thing looks more like something from the Wizard of Oz than a Chaos Dwarf machine.
Ghrask Dragh:
Actually I think it looks like something out of Labyrinth!?!
I think I might put those spiked helmets on some of my goblins!
hal:
I love it, Rackham produce some of my favourite minis (good old french).
I figure that it could be used as a Kolossus if it fit in with your fluff.