clam: we like these threads: it let’s us know what everyone wants. We often start talking about the theme partway through the Artisan’s Contest (and we talk about Artisan’s part way through GH), so we don’t always ed up going with what people have said. However, we take into account what everyone says and make future plans accordingly.
Anyone that feels we are simply ignoring their opinion here, it may be that more people have said something else, we have done something similar recently or we have something special about it planned.
GRNDL: A pie-flinging potato-bomb? I’d certainly be interested to see youmake that ^^ However, without knowing what interests you, we are simply guessing, so we’re more likely to go with the more concentrated wants of a majoirty than shotting in the dark, sorry. Not anything personal, just logical.
Ishkur, that’s largely because the first ever GH was a Chaos Dwarf rank and file On top of that, when we did a rank of slaves, people complained about having to do multiple models in the same space of time etc lol We also like to keep things fresh by creating competitions for things not done before. However, it;s still constantly being considered: we just often think there are cooler things to do
Ishkur, that's largely because the first ever GH was a Chaos Dwarf rank and file ;)
Hashut's Blessing
One CD Warrior is complately different from a whole rank of either warriors or blunderbuss.
On top of that, when we did a rank of slaves, people complained about having to do multiple models in the same space of time etc lol :P
Hashut's Blessing
A rank of slaves is much more difficult to make than a rank of standard warriors. For slaves you need to make unique looking models and it involves conversion if you want to make them look like they are actually slaves. It also involves needing models from loads of different armies.
A rank of models did in fact come up in the staff discussion of this matter recently. It was not shot down in pieces. I’m not saying that the idea made it to the top of the list of ideas though, but then I’m not saying that it didn’t either. Basically, it was discussed, don’t read anything into it though.
Pyro, I would argue that it is actually the same thing, just 5 times over But each to their own
You COULD go into the detail of obtaining models from several races or just group your races into units. However, Here, I would say that slaves require less conversion than Chaos Dwarf Warriors, but that’s my own personal style.
As cornixt has said, ranks were discussed. I tend not to say what we have and haven’t discussed because I always feel like I’ll dissuade people or give away the surprise, lol In all honesty, I’ve forgotten what the current one is, if we’ve even decided it yet ^^ (Although, that’s in no small part to me having spent the last two or three weeks offline.)
As cornixt has said, ranks were discussed. I tend not to say what we have and haven't discussed because I always feel like I'll dissuade people or give away the surprise, lol :P In all honesty, I've forgotten what the current one is, if we've even decided it yet ^^ (Although, that's in no small part to me having spent the last two or three weeks offline.)
Hashut's Blessing
I forgot too, all i remembered was the discussion :P
I don't like to give away much about what we discuss, especially in a thread like this because it restricts people's thinking a bit. In this case I didn't want anyone to think that we were automatically dismissing certain ideas.
But it goes to show, you can't please everyone all the time. We hope to please everyone at least some of the time, but even that isn't always feasible with some people.
However, without knowing what interests you, we are simply guessing, so we’re more likely to go with the more concentrated wants of a majoirty than shotting in the dark, sorry. Not anything personal, just logical.
