Baggronor:
I doubt they would be overpowered. A majority M3, not immune to psychology army should be ok, as long as the shooting isn’t outrageous… can’t be worse than Dwarfs with the Thorek gunline anyway.
Baggronor:
I doubt they would be overpowered. A majority M3, not immune to psychology army should be ok, as long as the shooting isn’t outrageous… can’t be worse than Dwarfs with the Thorek gunline anyway.
Kera foehunter:
omg this is going stronge 7 pages wow
Jangrim:
I, personally like armies that people say are old, unbalanced and outdated. The more someone says I can’t win with an army, the more I like it. I like having to use skill to win with an army. I like a challenge. I know that Gamesworkshop are trying to revamp some of these supposedly uncompetitive armies and make them stronger but perhaps some armies are best left for hardcore gamers.
In my experience the Dawi Zharr are far more subtle than their western cousins and to win, merely shelling the enemy to hell isn’t enough. To excel, you need to be a shrewd tactician. Not to say that the Dwarf army doesn’t require skill, indeed after playing them for six years, none of the beardlings can best me. But most of the new armies are easy for a novice to pick up and achieve moderate success with, which I guess is Gamesworkshop’s aim.
finishes grumbling… anyway… I just think that if we get a new list, at least make it one that can be uber powerful, but only in the right hands.